Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- caltester:caltesterplus:documentation:calculations [2024/06/19 13:47] – created sgranger
+++ caltester:caltesterplus:documentation:calculations [2024/09/06 13:53] (current) – [Calculations] wikisysop
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-====== Graphics ======
+====== Calculations ======
+===== Graphics =====
 The following graphics are from the [[https://www.has-motion.com/download/CalTester/CalTesterArticle2003.pdf|CalTester Paper]] Holden JP, Selbie WS, Stanhope SJ, "A proposed test to support the clinical movement analysis laboratory".
-{{Fig1CalTesterArticle.png}}
+{{:Fig1CalTesterArticle.png}}
-{{Fig2CalTesterArticle.png}}
+{{:Fig2CalTesterArticle.png}}
-====== Calculations ======
+===== Calculations =====
 The following calculations and explanations are from the [[https://www.has-motion.com/download/CalTesterPlus/CalTesterArticle2003.pdf|CalTester Paper]] Holden JP, Selbie WS, Stanhope SJ, "A proposed test to support the clinical movement analysis laboratory".\\
@@ Line 16: / Line 18: @@
 Free-body diagram of testing device: Fp, ground reaction force; Fg, gravitational force (weight); Fa, applied force; r, position vector between tips (p to a) of testing device rod:\\
-{{Calc1CalTesterPlusArticle.png}}\\
+{{:Calc1CalTesterPlusArticle.png}}\\
 Thus, r and A are parallel and the test device rod orientation (r) is defined entirely by the vector quantity A that is derived from FP measurements (Fp) and the physical characteristics of the testing device (Fg/2, i.e.the weight of the rod and its center of mass location; in this case, half the rod length).\\
-{{CalTesterPlus_DeltaTheta.jpg}}\\
+{{:CalTesterPlus_DeltaTheta.jpg}}\\
-The rod orientation variable ( {{DeltaTheta.jpg}}) is determined from the dot product of the unit vector along A and the unit vector aligned with the long axis of the rod (r) as determined using the motion capture components.\\
+The rod orientation variable ( {{:DeltaTheta.jpg}}) is determined from the dot product of the unit vector along A and the unit vector aligned with the long axis of the rod (r) as determined using the motion capture components.\\
 \\
 **Section II : Equation for evaluating the static equilibrium assumption**\\
@@ Line 27: / Line 29: @@
 Under 2D dynamic conditions, the following holds:\\
-{{CalTesterPlus_Eq4_v2.jpg}}\\
+{{:CalTesterPlus_Eq4_v2.jpg}} \\
 \\
 Rewriting the left-hand side of Eq. (4)\\
-{{CalTesterPlus_Eq5_v2.jpg}}\\
+{{:20140107212337caltesterplus_eq5_v2.jpg}} \\
 \\
-Rearranging Eq. (5), the magnitude of the angular displacement ( {{Beta.jpg}} ) between vectors r and A due exclusively to the inertial terms can be isolated:\\
+Rearranging Eq. (5), the magnitude of the angular displacement ( {{:Beta.jpg}} ) between vectors r and A due exclusively to the inertial terms can be isolated:\\
 \\
-{{CalTesterPlus_Eq6_v2.jpg}}\\
+{{:CalTesterPlus_Eq6_v2.jpg}} \\
 \\
-where r is the length of the testing device rod, Icg the moment of inertia of the test device rod about the center of mass location, m the mass of the testing device rod and {{ThetaDoubleDot.jpg}} is the angular acceleration of the testing device rod relative to an inertial reference frame.
+where r is the length of the testing device rod, Icg the moment of inertia of the test device rod about the center of mass location, m the mass of the testing device rod and {{:ThetaDoubleDot.jpg}} is the angular acceleration of the testing device rod relative to an inertial reference frame.
-CalTesterPlus does not calculate {{Beta.jpg}} since it operates under the assumption that there is no angular acceleration. For this reason it is important to move the CalTester rod slowly at a constant speed.
+CalTesterPlus does not calculate {{:Beta.jpg}} since it operates under the assumption that there is no angular acceleration. For this reason it is important to move the CalTester rod slowly at a constant speed.