User Tools

Site Tools


sift:tutorials:perform_statistical_parametric_mapping

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
sift:tutorials:perform_statistical_parametric_mapping [2024/12/17 18:12] – [GLM] wikisysopsift:tutorials:perform_statistical_parametric_mapping [2024/12/17 18:27] (current) – [Analysis] wikisysop
Line 126: Line 126:
     - For unregistered data:     - For unregistered data:
       * SPM Name: SPM       * SPM Name: SPM
-      * Statistic: t Statistic+      * Statistic: Two Sample T-Test
       * Group 1: OA       * Group 1: OA
       * Group 2: NC       * Group 2: NC
 +      * Threshold: 0.05
 +      * Two-Tailed: Checked
  
 === Registered Data === === Registered Data ===
Line 137: Line 139:
     - For registered data:     - For registered data:
       * SPM Name: SPM_Registered       * SPM Name: SPM_Registered
-      * Statistic: t Statistic+      * Statistic: Two Sample T-Test
       * Group 1: OA_Registered       * Group 1: OA_Registered
       * Group 2: NC_Registered       * Group 2: NC_Registered
 +      * Threshold: 0.05
 +      * Two-Tailed: Checked
  
-We have now calculated two SPMs, which we can easily compare/contrast by selecting the GLM and SPM Results we want in the top bar of the SPM tab. Both SPMs provide us with similar insights: there is a statistical difference between the 2 groups, and it is most prominent during mid-stance(roughly 10%-25% of the gait cycle), as well as mid-swing (roughly 55%-85% of the gait cycle). For the given threshold (defaults to alpha=0.01), we have established that there is a difference between the 2 groups (more precisely, we determined that the null hypothesis that the 2 groups are from the same population sample is false at alpha<0.01).+We have now calculated two SPMs, which we can easily compare/contrast by selecting the GLM and SPM Results we want in the top bar of the SPM tab. Both SPMs provide us with similar insights: there is a statistical difference between the 2 groups, and it is most prominent during mid-stance(roughly 10%-25% of the gait cycle), as well as mid-swing (roughly 55%-85% of the gait cycle). For the given threshold (defaults to alpha=0.01), we have established that there is a difference between the 2 groups (more precisely, we determined that the null hypothesis that the 2 groups are from the same population sample is false at alpha<0.05).
  
  
 {{:SPM_Plot1.png?800}} {{:SPM_Plot1.png?800}}
  
-The difference between both SPMs is most apparent at ~65% of the gait cycle. Here we can see a significantly more pronounced t statistic (~10 vs ~12.5). While both are well above the specified threshold where alpha=0.01, this can show us how curve registration can be useful to correctly align our data, and get more meaningful results from our analysis. +The difference between both SPMs is most apparent at ~65% of the gait cycle. Here we can see a significantly more pronounced t statistic (~10 vs ~12.5). While both are well above the specified threshold where alpha=0.05, this can show us how curve registration can be useful to correctly align our data, and get more meaningful results from our analysis. 
  
 {{:SPM_Plot2.png?800}} {{:SPM_Plot2.png?800}}
sift/tutorials/perform_statistical_parametric_mapping.1734459163.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/12/17 18:12 by wikisysop